Part 1: Foundations
A. Choosing Your Entity and Jurisdiction
Before you've hired anyone, raised a dollar, or written a line of product, you'll make one decision that quietly shapes every legal and financial choice that follows: what kind of entity you form, and where.
For most venture-backed companies, the answer is a Delaware C-corporation. That's not a rule of law — it's a convention, and conventions exist for reasons worth understanding rather than just following.
Why Delaware
Delaware's Court of Chancery has decided corporate disputes for over a century, which means there's a deep, predictable body of case law covering almost every fight a startup could have — fiduciary duty questions, stock disputes, M&A litigation. Predictability is what investors are buying when they insist on Delaware. It's not favoritism toward founders or investors; it's that everyone already knows the rules.
Delaware also has flexible corporate statutes that make it easy to create multiple classes of stock, issue convertible instruments, and restructure quickly — all things venture financing requires repeatedly.
Why a C-Corporation, Not an LLC
LLCs are often the right choice for a small services business or a company that never plans to raise institutional capital. They offer pass-through taxation and flexible governance. But most VC funds are structured as pass-through entities themselves (often with tax-exempt or foreign limited partners), and investing in an LLC can create tax complications for those investors that a corporation avoids entirely.
A C-corp also makes it straightforward to issue stock options, preferred stock, and multiple funding rounds — the standard toolkit of venture financing. Converting from an LLC to a C-corp later is possible but adds cost, delay, and complexity right when you're trying to close a round.
What Changes Once VC Money Is in the Picture
If you've formed as something other than a Delaware C-corp — a home-state LLC, an S-corp, a foreign entity — raising institutional venture capital will likely require a conversion or a reincorporation before or alongside your first priced round. This is common and manageable, but it takes time: typically several weeks of drafting, board and stockholder approvals, and state filings.
The practical lesson isn't “always form in Delaware from day one.” Plenty of founders start with a simpler structure while bootstrapping and convert once they know venture capital is the path. The lesson is to make the choice deliberately, with an understanding of what it will cost you to change later, rather than defaulting to whatever a template or a friend's startup used.
Physical Location vs. Incorporation State
Where you incorporate has nothing to do with where you live or operate. A company can be incorporated in Delaware while its founders live in Texas, its office is in California, and its employees are scattered across a dozen states. Incorporation state governs your corporate law; where you actually do business determines your tax registrations, employment law obligations, and licensing requirements — a separate and often more complicated question.
The One-Sentence Version
Choose Delaware and a C-corp not because it's required, but because it's the structure sophisticated investors already understand — and understanding, in a financing negotiation, is worth more than almost any other advantage you could build into your paperwork.
B. Cap Table Basics — What Founders Get Wrong Early
A cap table — short for capitalization table — is simply the record of who owns what percentage of your company. It sounds like bookkeeping. It's actually one of the most consequential documents you'll maintain, because every future investor, employee, and acquirer will read it as a statement of who has power and who doesn't.
Founders rarely get the concept wrong. They get the early mechanics wrong, in ways that are cheap to fix in month two and expensive — sometimes unfixable — by the time a Series A term sheet shows up.
Mistake One: Splitting Equity Without a Vesting Schedule
Co-founders often split ownership evenly on day one and issue fully-vested shares immediately, on the logic that trust between friends doesn't need a legal mechanism. Then a co-founder leaves eight months later — for good reasons or bad — owning a meaningful chunk of a company they no longer work on. Investors will ask about this immediately, because it has killed deals before.
The fix is standard four-year vesting with a one-year cliff, applied to founders just as it would be to any early employee. It isn't a sign of distrust; it's the market standard, and its absence is what actually raises eyebrows.
Mistake Two: Handshake Equity Promises
Early advisors, contractors, or almost-co-founders are often promised “a few points” verbally, with nothing documented. These promises resurface during diligence for a priced round, sometimes as a demand, sometimes as a threat of litigation. A verbal equity promise doesn't disappear because it was never signed — it becomes a liability sitting quietly on your cap table until someone asks about it at the worst possible time.
Anything resembling an equity promise should be documented, even informally, the same week it's made — with a clear percentage, vesting terms, and conditions.
Mistake Three: Not Reserving an Option Pool Early
Companies that don't set aside an equity pool for future hires end up creating one later by diluting existing stockholders — usually the founders — right when they can least afford it, during a financing negotiation. Investors typically require an option pool of 10–20% to be carved out before a priced round closes, and if it isn't already reserved, the dilution comes disproportionately from founder shares rather than being shared across the cap table.
Mistake Four: Losing Track of Convertible Instruments
SAFEs and convertible notes don't show up as equity on a cap table until they convert — which makes it easy to lose track of how much of the company they'll actually represent once a priced round triggers conversion. Founders are sometimes surprised, at the moment of conversion, by how much less of the company they own than they expected. Modeling out fully-diluted ownership — including every outstanding SAFE, at its actual cap and discount — before you're deep into a new raise avoids that surprise.
The One-Sentence Version
A cap table is a record of promises, and every promise you don't document, vest, or model out properly becomes a problem that surfaces later — usually during the one moment you most need the story to be clean.
C. Founder Equity, Vesting, and Re-Vesting
Vesting is the mechanism by which equity is earned over time rather than granted all at once. For founders, it can feel counterintuitive — you started the company, why should you have to earn shares in it? — but it protects everyone, including you, from the scenario where a co-founder leaves early holding a large stake they no longer work for.
Standard Vesting Mechanics
The market standard is four-year vesting with a one-year cliff: nothing vests until you've been with the company for a full year, at which point 25% vests at once, with the remainder vesting monthly or quarterly over the following three years. This structure is so common that deviating from it — in either direction — tends to draw investor questions.
Credit for Time Already Served
If you've already been working on the company for a year before formalizing vesting, it's standard and reasonable to negotiate credit for that time, shortening your remaining vesting period accordingly. This should be documented explicitly in your stock purchase agreement rather than assumed.
What Re-Vesting Means and Why Investors Ask For It
By the time you raise a priced round, some founders have already fully vested their original shares under the terms set at incorporation. Investors will often ask fully-vested founders to “re-vest” some portion of their shares — putting a portion of already-earned equity back on a new vesting schedule going forward.
The logic isn't punitive: investors are underwriting the team's continued commitment, not just the company's past progress, and a founder who could walk away today with a fully-vested stake creates a different risk profile than one still earning theirs.
Negotiating Re-Vesting Terms
A few terms are worth negotiating deliberately rather than accepting as boilerplate: the length of the new vesting period (shorter than a full four years is common when some vesting has already occurred), what happens to unvested shares if you're terminated without cause or leave for good reason, and whether an acquisition accelerates vesting (a “single-trigger” or “double-trigger” acceleration clause).
Double-trigger acceleration — vesting accelerates only if both an acquisition occurs and the founder is terminated or has their role meaningfully diminished afterward — is the more common and more balanced structure, protecting founders from being pushed out right after a sale without protecting against ordinary departures.
The One-Sentence Version
Vesting isn't a sign that anyone doubts you — it's the industry's way of aligning equity with ongoing commitment, and understanding its mechanics well enough to negotiate the details is worth far more than resisting the concept itself.